90 Day Satisfaction Guarantee
Most people who get hurt on someone else's property assume the fall was their own fault, and Nova Scotia law says otherwise more often than they expect. The province's Occupiers' Liability Act places a positive duty on whoever controls a property to take reasonable care that visitors are safe, and when that duty is breached, the injured person has a claim.
Wagners has held property owners, businesses, landlords and institutions to that standard across Halifax and the rest of Nova Scotia. If a dangerous property injured you, a free consultation with a premises liability lawyer on our team will tell you whether the occupier met their legal duty or fell short of it.
The Act requires an occupier to take reasonable care, in all the circumstances, to see that people and their property are reasonably safe. An occupier is anyone controlling a property's condition or activities: the owner, a tenant, a business, a property manager, a maintenance contractor, sometimes several at once. More than one can share responsibility, so part of building a claim is naming every party whose failure contributed.
The duty covers the property's condition, the activities carried on there and the conduct of third parties the occupier allows. Reasonable care is the measuring stick, not perfection, so the question is what a sensible occupier would have done: inspections on a schedule, hazards fixed or flagged, ice treated in reasonable time. An occupier who can show no system at all has usually answered that question already.
Unsafe premises take recognizable forms, and a handful of hazards come up again and again:
Each of these reflects a failure of maintenance, inspection, or foresight, which is precisely what the Act holds occupiers accountable for.
The most frequent claims are slip and fall accidents, which is why so much of this work turns on ice, lighting and stair maintenance. Dog bites form a second major category, and Nova Scotia municipalities set their own dog by-laws under the Municipal Government Act, so a breach of the local restraint rules is often where these claims start. A third involves care facilities, where nursing home negligence claims arise when institutions fail residents through inadequate supervision, hazardous conditions, or neglect of basic care duties.
You prove what the hazard was, how long it was there and what the occupier did about it, and all three run on evidence that disappears fast. Camera footage loops over within days, ice melts by afternoon, repairs erase the hazard itself. Photographs, witness names and a written report to the occupier are worth more than anything done later.
The occupier's own records then carry the claim forward. Inspection logs, salting and sanding records, maintenance contracts, and prior complaints show whether a reasonable system existed and whether it was followed on the day in question. Environment Canada's historical weather data fills in what conditions demanded, hour by hour.
Occupiers commonly answer that the injured person was not watching where they walked, and Nova Scotia's Contributory Negligence Act does allow a court to divide damages according to how much each side was at fault. A finding of shared responsibility reduces a claim rather than ending it, and where the degrees of fault cannot be sorted out the Act splits them equally. Pushing back on inflated fault arguments is standard work in these files, and it has to happen inside the two-year limitation period the Limitation of Actions Act sets for most injury claims.
Premises cases reward experience, because they are won on maintenance records, weather reconstruction and credibility rather than drama. Wagners has acted for injured Nova Scotians since Ray Wagner founded the firm in Halifax in 1982, and our lawyers are recognized by Best Lawyers and ranked by Lexpert.
We handle every dangerous premises claim on a no-win, no-fee basis, advancing the costs of records, reports and assessments ourselves. One lawyer runs your file from first meeting to resolution, whether you are in Halifax or anywhere else in the province we can reach by road or video call. Finding out whether your claim has merit costs nothing, so tell us what happened and we will tell you where you stand.
Here are the questions injured visitors most often ask about unsafe premises claims.
No, the Occupiers' Liability Act applies to private homes as well as businesses. The duty of reasonable care does not switch off because the property is residential.
Claims against a municipality follow their own rules, and they run far tighter than the general two-year period. You generally have to give the municipality written notice within 30 days and start the action within 12 months. Contact a lawyer immediately if a public sidewalk or roadway was involved, because those clocks start the day you fall.
No, though an early report strengthens a claim, its absence does not erase your rights. Medical records, witnesses, and photographs can still establish what happened. Report it in writing now, and note why the delay occurred.
Yes, landlords who control common areas like stairwells, entrances, and parking lots owe the same duty of reasonable care to tenants and their guests. Disrepair complaints that went unanswered become powerful evidence. Keep copies of every message you sent about the hazard.
A warning is one factor, not a shield, and the question remains whether reasonable care was taken overall. A cone beside an ice sheet that should have been treated days earlier may not satisfy the duty. Signage cases turn on their specific facts.
"*" indicates required fields